Welcome to Hong Kong CAS Testing ~

lang  CN

Our Services

Rubber stadium quality appraisal

Rubber stadium quality appraisal-Machinery & Equipment-CAS Testing Technical Services (Hong Kong) Company Limited

Rubber Course QualityAppraisal Background

rubber court is an all-weather sports venue composed of polyurethane rubber and other materials, which has excellent physical properties and durability. ‌
The construction materials of this kind of venue include polyurethane prepolymer, ‌mixed polyether, ‌waste tire rubber, ‌EPDM rubber granules or PU granules, ‌pigments, ‌auxiliaries and fillers, etc. ‌These materials together give the rubber court good flatness, ‌compressive strength, ‌hardness, elasticity and stability. ‌
rubber court also has certain UV resistance and aging resistance, ‌making it internationally recognized as the best all-weather indoor and outdoor sports ground material. ‌
In the case of rubber court quality appraisal, Zhongke Testing can provide rubber court quality appraisal services.

Rubber Course QualityAccreditation criteria

GB/T 14833-2020 Synthetic material sports ground floor
SJG_29-2016 Synthetic material sports ground floor quality control standard
GB36246-2018 Primary and secondary school synthetic material surface sports ground
GB/T 22517.6-2011 Requirements for the use of sports venues and inspection methods Part 6: Track and field venues
GB/T 20033.3-2006 Requirements and inspection methods for the use of artificial materials for sports venues Part 3: Artificial grass surface layers for football fields
GB/T 19995.1-2005 Requirements for the use of natural materials for sports fields and inspection methods Part 1: Natural grass surface layers for football fields

Rubber Course QualityAuthentication case

Quality Product Dispute Situation:
The demander signed a project contract with the supplier, stipulating that the supplier would undertake the construction of the rubber court project for the demander's sports venues and facilities on a contract basis. During the supplier's construction, the demander found that the supplier's construction quality could not meet the requirements and believed that there was a problem with the ratio of rubber particles and glue. The buyer later discovered that the "court" involved in the case was peeling off and discolored in large areas.
Regarding this, the supplier believes that there is no problem with the ratio of rubber particles and glue, and the quality also meets the requirements stipulated in the contract. In order to ascertain the facts, the client asked the client to conduct an appraisal on whether the quality of the "court" involved in the case complied with the stipulations in the engineering contract signed by the supplier and the buyer.
was entrusted by a court to assess whether the quality of the "court" involved in the case complied with the stipulations in the engineering contract signed by the supply and demand parties.
quality analysis results: The
quality analysis expert group conducted a discussion and comprehensive quality technical analysis on the on-site inspection and random sampling testing of the "court" involved in the case, and made the following suggestions and conclusions: The quality of the
"court" involved in the case does not comply with the engineering contract signed by the supplier and the buyer.

最新资讯