A company signed a contract with XX Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and provided the plate shape and related parameters of the container production line, which was designed and manufactured by XX Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. However, after the "container production line equipment" involved in the case was delivered, the company discovered that the products produced by the equipment involved did not meet technical standards and that the equipment involved itself had quality problems. .
Our company was entrusted by the court to conduct an appraisal of the container production line equipment involved in this case.
Appraisal analysis results:
The quality analysis expert group discussed and comprehensively analyzed the relevant information, on-site investigation and inspection conditions, and inspection and testing data of the "container production line equipment" involved in the case, and made the following quality analysis opinions:
The "container production line equipment" involved in the case was discovered during the identification process. The equipment involved in the case failed, the chain broke, and the equipment involved did not have the conditions to continuously produce qualified products; the embossed rollers in the "container production line equipment" involved in the case
0 did not meet the agreed GCr15 material requirements and did not meet the requirements of shearing error ±1mm; the "container production line equipment" involved in the case 1 2 had the sprockets and large shafts welded together, which did not comply with the economic principles of mechanical equipment design. 3456789