Quality appraisal of kaolin production equipment

Kaolin is a clay mineral formed by the weathering of feldspar or other silicate hydrochloric acid minerals in igneous and metamorphic rocks in an acidic medium lacking alkali metals and alkaline earth metals. It has certain plasticity, binding, viscosity, dryness, sintering, refractory adsorption, suspension, selectability, and electrical insulation. It is widely used in papermaking, ceramics, rubber, chemicals, coatings, medicine, etc.
In the case of kaolin production equipment quality appraisal, Zhongke Testing can provide kaolin production equipment quality appraisal services.

Kaolin production equipment mainly includes feeders, crushing equipment (jaw crusher), conveying equipment, bucket elevators, mills (Raymond mill, European mill, trapezoidal mill, vertical mill), conveying systems, dust removal equipment, etc.

GB 5083-1999 "General Principles for Safety and Hygiene Design of Production Equipment"
"Appraisal Letter of Authorization"
"Civil Complaint"
"Agreement"
"Existing Equipment Modification Plan"
"Mining Production Line Modification Equipment List"
"Investigation Record Sheet"
"Inspection Record Sheet"

XX Mining Company Ltd. (the applicant) in the contract dispute between Shaiqii and Liu Chii (the respondent) v. to the XX District People ' s Court, which had to entrust our unit with the examination of the case and requested an assessment of the quality of the highland production equipment in question.
was commissioned by the court to conduct an analysis of the “already available quality” of the equipment used to produce the land in question. The results of the identification and analysis of
: the team of experts in the validation and analysis of
discussed the relevant information on the equipment, the site survey and the comprehensive technical analysis of the quality of the equipment in question, and made the following recommendations and conclusions:
1) the transfer of belts without protective coverings, which did not meet the requirements of the national mandatory standards;
2) the equipment in question was improved, dismantled or replaced, and the production of highland soil products could not be properly processed;
3) the equipment in question was not fully adapted and the production of the agreed products and production was not subject to evaluation. HTMLGTOKEN7